Assembly
Votes to Ban Same-Sex Unions
by Deanna Tiefenthal for tamfs.org
This is the report developed by TAMFS
Assembly
sends same sex union ban amendment to presbyteries
by Jerry L. Van Marter
This is the report prepared by PC USA News
Presbyterians
Vote to Ban Clergy From Conducting Unions of Gays
by Gustav Niebuhr
The New York Times
Presbyterians
Vote Down Unions
[An excellent summary of this action and of the
Assembly in General]
Presbyterians Vote Down Unions
PlanetOut
News Staff
Friday, June 30,
2000 / 01:59 AM
SUMMARY: The denomination's General Assembly
has again voted to stop discussing same-gender unions and have its presbyteries
ban them once and for all.
The highest policy-making body of the Presbyterian
Church (USA) late on June 30 voted 268 - 251 to amend its constitution
to explicitly prohibit "same-sex union ceremonies." However, the amendment
to the Book of Order will have to be ratified by a majority of the 2.5-million-member
denomination's 171 regional presbyteries. The narrow margin of passage
in the General Assembly suggests that ratification may fail, as it did
when the General Assembly passed a similar measure in 1995. Currently,
as affirmed in May by the denomination's highest judicial authority, ministers
and local congregations may choose to perform such ceremonies as long as
it is clear that they are not marriages. The denomination holds that sexual
activity should occur only within heterosexual marriage.
Earlier in the day the General Assembly had agreed
to put off the gay and lesbian union ceremonies debate until the
very end of its agenda, after dinner on this final day of business other
than budgets. A counterproposal to hold the debate in the afternoon was
defeated. The previous day, the General Assembly had agreed to prohibit
demonstrations inside the convention center by individuals or groups, authorizing
the moderator to call a recess should a demonstration occur. Presbyterians
pride themselves on doing things "in good order," and delegates may well
have been concerned not to see a repeat of the demonstration held on the
floor of the United Methodist Church General Conference in protest of anti-g/l/b/t
votes, although that was entirely peaceful.
When the time finally arrived, the main part of
the debate centered around a minority report presented by 16 members of
the Assembly Committee on Physical and Spiritual Well-Being, which had
voted 25 - 23 to recommend passage of the ban on union ceremonies. The
minority's "can we talk?" substitute motion asked the full Assembly to
agree to three affirmations: to continue dialogue on unity and diversity
issues; to uphold the Presbyterian tradition of allowing individual pastors
and congregations to order worship and pastoral care; and to understand
that the conflict involves the interpretation rather than the authority
of Scripture. The General Assembly had agreed earlier to continue for a
second year to avoid action on the denomination's current ban on ordination
of sexually active gays and lesbians. However the delegates were less inclined
to prolong the discussion on union ceremonies and rejected the minority
report by a vote of 273 - 247.
Prior to the final vote the delegates and observers
were instructed not to respond "audibly" to the results. After the same-sex
union prohibition was passed a 10-minute recess was called and about 50
supporters of lesbians and gays gathered in a corridor to sing hymns in
protest; they did not attempt to enter the meeting hall. As the delegates
returned to continue the meeting, the pianist played "Blessed Be the Tie
That Binds."
In other gay-related business on June 29, the
Twin Cities Area Presbytery of Minnesota had proposed adding "sexual orientation"
to the denomination's membership non-discrimination statement, which currently
specifies "race, ethnic origin or worldly condition." Instead, the Assembly
chose not to expand the list but to throw it out altogether, in favor of
a statement reading, "No persons shall be denied membership in the Presbyterian
Church (USA) for any reason not related to profession of faith." This proposed
constitutional amendment was passed 384 - 127, and it too will be sent
on to the presbyteries for ratification.
Also on June 29, the General Assembly approved
by a hearty 423 - 82 vote a proposal by the Presbytery of San Francisco
to "develop resources and tools to assist congregations in ministries of
evangelism, programming and pastoral care with gay, lesbian, bisexual,
and transgendered persons and their families and friends." One amendment
to this proposal that succeeded said to "consult Scripture and the Confessions
of our denomination in developing resources." Another amendment required
that "former" g/l/b/t church members participate in developing the materials.
Many other amendments were proposed but defeated, including a proposal
that the resources conform to the sexual standards which apply to ordained
officers of the church -- fidelity in marriage or chastity in singleness.
In the course of the vigorous debate on the g/l/b/t resources and the denomination's
sex education curriculum, fire alarms went off for the second time in two
days at the conference -- a truly heated discussion.
The so-called "take a hike" proposal from the
Beaver-Butler Presbytery was crushed 453 - 71. This proposal would have
declared that an "irreconcilable impasse" exists within the denomination,
and that those unwilling to toe the line in eight key areas -- Biblical
authority and interpretation, Jesus Christ and salvation, ethics, leadership,
sanctification, and the nature of the church -- should leave. Homosexuality
seems to be the fault line that exposes differences over Biblical authority
and interpretation both among Presbyterians and in other denominations,
with literalists insisting it can only be viewed as a sin.
A church commissioner from Beaver-Butler, minister
Jack Patrick, used homosexuality as his example of what he called a "theological
divide." He said, "We can no longer ignore the central issues of theology
in our church. We need to bring these theological issues to the forefront
so that we can declare what we really believe as Presbyterians. Diversity
can only go so far before we no longer can be called a confessing church
of Jesus Christ." Instead, the Assembly affirmed a statement in response
that said, "We choose to see differences positively and believe that differences
in fact have the potential to make our unity in Christ even stronger" and
"Our prayer is that we all might strive for the 'still more excellent way,'
which is our mutual love and forbearance of one another."
The Assembly also agreed to the formation of a
task force to consider how to refer to the persons of the Trinity in "inclusive
language" rather than masculine terms, since God is believed to be beyond
gender.
Copyright © 1995-1999
PlanetOut Corporation. All Copyright & Trademark Rights Reserved.